Dedicated to Your Physical Transformation
Q: I just started using the 4X methods. Great stuff. Loving the pumps, but I’m wondering if 4X is better for maximum muscle size or Downward-Progression 4X [adding weight each set so reps fall—12,10,8,6] – what’s the best muscle-growth method for me?
A: Both methods provide a powerful hypertrophic Density effect. That’s because you rest only 35 to 45 seconds between sets. That gets you to the critical growth threshold quickly… [Read more…]
Q: I like to train heavy, but I fully understand that tension time, or density, can build size as well. My question is, won’t drop sets accomplish both?
A: The drop-set method is one of the best for getting size in the myofibrils as well as a hypertrophic sarcoplasmic burst. And even new veinage too… [Read more…]
Q: I’ve been using the 4X mass method on just about every exercise for just over a month and have gained five pounds of muscle. I’m still lean with abs, so I know it’s not fat. I often do 3X sequences, the way you sometimes recommend, but if I don’t do all 4 sets, I feel guilty. It’s just that I don’t want to overtrain, which is how I feel when I do 4X on all exercises. Should I just bite the bullet and do 4X on everything?
A: If you’ve gained five pounds of muscle in a little more than a month, you’re doing damn good! Most bodybuilders don’t gain five pounds in a year… [Read more…]
Q: I’ve been using 4X sequences, 10 reps per set, and your new downward-progression 4X [12-10-8-6, adding weight each set, 45-second rests]. Both have been working great with some obvious mass gains (people have been commenting at the gym and when I’m out around town—love it!). My problem is that on some exercises the heaviest set on DP 4X hurts my joints. Like on bench presses, my shoulder can’t take it. Should I just drop the 6-rep set?
A: When you say bench presses, we assume you mean with a bar and not dumbbells. DBs may not cause pain because of freedom of movement. [Read more…]
Q: I’ve been TORQ-ing the target muscle at the end of my 4X workouts. Great way to end with a massive pump, but I tell people about it and they think I’m saying twerking. Lol. I have two questions: What if I can get more than 30 reps on the first set? What if I get fewer reps than that? Also, in Positions of Flexion, can I use bench dips instead of pushdowns for the finishing contracted position exercise for tri’s?
A: For the uninitiated, TORQ-ing, not twerking, is a 3X sequence of 30-20-15 reps, with 45 seconds between…
If you use it on the big midrange exercise first, like close-grip bench presses for tri’s, you may be able to add weight on each set. If you TORQ on the last exercise, contracted, you probably won’t be able to add weight.
TORQ—or tension-overload repetition quantity—is designed so you get at least a couple of sets within the high-end hypertrophic tension time—which is above 60 seconds. That would be sets 1 and 2 if you keep the rep speed at one second to lift and two to three to lower…
We tend to use the 1/2 tempo on higher-rep sets—but that’s still around 90 seconds on set 1 and 60 seconds on set 2. That high growth tension time is something most bodybuilders never get. Heck, many rarely get more than 25 seconds per set (can you say slow-to-no growth?).
Mr. America Doug Brignole goes even higher with his reps, starting at 50—and he swears it’s the best size-building method he’s ever used (see The Power-Density Mass Workout 2.0 for more on Doug’s Super-TORQ method, an interview with him, and his complete program, which uses only ONE exercise per target muscle).
Now to your first question (finally): What if you get more or fewer reps than 30 on the first set? If you get more, like 35, just continue to get higher reps on each set—35, 25, 18, say—and add weight at your next workout to bring down your reps…
If you get fewer, like 25, that’s fine too. In fact, we like to think of a TORQ sequence as ranges: 25-30, 15-20, 10-15. Even at a 1/2 tempo, you’ll still hit the high-end hypertrophic tension time on set 1—and maybe set 2 as well….
If you get fewer than 25 on the first set, lighten the weight for your second so you get close to matching your first. Your sets may go 22-20-15. Once again, you achieve high-end tension on sets 1 and 2.
Okay, your second question is a simple yes. We love bench dips for the POF contracted-position triceps exercise. While there is some movement at the shoulder, your front delts don’t come into play too much. You’ll torch your tri’s guaranteed.
We like to do the first 30- and 20-rep sets with no lockout, then the last set with a lockout squeeze on each (we usually don’t get 15 on that set—killer!).
Also, if you’re not strong enough to get 30 with your feet on a bench (as pictured above), put them on the floor so you’re using less than bodyweight on all of your TORQ sets…
It’s an excellent TORQ exercise to fry your tri’s for awesome new size.
Till next time, train hard—and smart—for BIG results.
—Steve Holman and Jonathan Lawson
www.X-Rep.com
Q: Your 4X Mass Workout e-book is one of my favorites, but I’m not sure using 4X at every workout will produce maximum mass for me. As you say in The Ultimate Power-Density Mass Workout, a muscle needs both density and power to grow to its biggest at the fastest rate possible. To me, 4X feels like more density because I fatigue very quickly. Then the muscle feels worthless on the next exercise. I’m thinking about using the Ultimate Power-Density Mass Workout that includes both 4X [short rests] and power sets [with longer rests]. Are there any adjustments you would suggest?
A: The Ultimate Power-Density Mass Workout is great for building size and strength (4X is primarily for muscle size). As you said, the Power-Density Mass Workout is a mix of straight power sets, 4X sequences and drop sets. For example, here’s the biceps routine from the full-range Positions-of-Flexion workout in that e-book: [Read more…]
Q: I’ve been using the Full-Range 4X Mass Workout [on pages 46-48 of that e-book] for a month, and I’ve noticed that my muscles appear to be not only bigger, but rounder. I’m looking more like a bodybuilder! I’m not imagining this, as people have told me that at my gym. It’s fantastic, but I’m wondering why. Is it because of the extra sets with 4X on 3 exercises for each bodypart? I was only doing one or two exercises for each muscle before, so it must be the added volume.
A: That’s part of it. The extra volume with short rests during a 4X sequence helps deplete more glycogen from the muscles, and therefore they supercompensate and store more. That extra glycogen gives the muscles a fuller, rounder look, like Bob Paris’, who is pictured below (but there’s more to it than that, as you’ll see)… [Read more…]
Q: If 4×10 [as in the 4X technique] is so effective at achieving both power and density for maximum muscle mass, why would one bother with 10×10? You wrote that a trainee should only stay on 10×10 for three to four weeks since staying on it longer may compromise the power component. If you believe 4×10 is clearly superior, why waste time on 10×10?
A: 10×10 is a PURE DENSITY shock tactic that can produce big gains in muscle size quickly—and you only do it on one key exercise for each bodypart. That means it takes only 10 minutes to thoroughly and completely blast a muscle into the growth zone—but we only recommend this pure density approach for a four-week shock phase… [Read more…]
Q: In your early e-books, like The Ultimate Mass Workout, you say that generating maximum force is the key to muscle mass. To me, it doesn’t seem like you ever exert max force with 4X training because you are using moderate weights. Do you still think creating maximum force is the way to build the most mass?
A: Yes, we believe force is one of the big keys to packing on muscle mass—but there’s more than one way to get enough… [Read more…]
Q: You recently mentioned that adding sets to 4X to make it 6X or higher emphasizes density with less power. Wouldn’t that be a good way to get more muscle gains in the endurance-oriented muscles like abs, calves, and forearms? Even quads?
A: That’s a good observation. Some muscles are much more endurance oriented and require a distinct density emphasis to grow as opposed to power. Exclusive low-rep power training doesn’t do much for forearm or calf muscle gains in most trainees. [Read more…]
